tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1765684349405179753.post8101890693677562362..comments2023-10-05T03:44:46.454-04:00Comments on For The First Time (or the last time): 1922: first 3D movieMichael N. Marcushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14572325935572298962noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1765684349405179753.post-27830433266229911912011-12-07T13:10:21.720-05:002011-12-07T13:10:21.720-05:00to the second anonymous...
There IS a way to view...to the second anonymous...<br /><br />There IS a way to view 3d content without wearing glasses. It's called the parallax barrier. You should research it, it is very interesting.<br /><br />The biggest downside to the parallax barrier is that unlike anglyph, polarized, and active shutter glasses, the parallax barrier method forces you to watch contect from a very limited area - if you angle yourself too much, the technology is rendered ineffective.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1765684349405179753.post-86322147861236207342010-10-06T12:28:05.508-04:002010-10-06T12:28:05.508-04:00This is a different Anonymous from the person abov...This is a different Anonymous from the person above. <br /><br />I have a challenge to those in the 3D TV broadcasting business and the 3D movie business: This is 2010, not 1952. With all the technological advances made over these 50-some years, the need for 3D glasses should be obsolete. I believe that technology has advanced far enough that it should be possible to get that 3D look on a flat screen. Given the HD technology, 3D TV broadcasts should be possible using a regular HDTV.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1765684349405179753.post-32779083592210092842009-02-01T05:27:00.000-05:002009-02-01T05:27:00.000-05:00Do you know how to get a copy of "Power of Love"?Do you know how to get a copy of "Power of Love"?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com